From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763507AbYDOE6U (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:58:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753513AbYDOE6E (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:58:04 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:44367 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753111AbYDOE6B (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:58:01 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 05:57:38 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Crispin Cowan Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Tetsuo Handa , paul.moore@hp.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, takedakn@nttdata.co.jp, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [TOMOYO #7 30/30] Hooks for SAKURA and TOMOYO. Message-ID: <20080415045738.GE9785@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20080404122242.867070732@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> <20080404122408.986477936@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> <200804071140.59247.paul.moore@hp.com> <47FC8052.9070409@nttdata.co.jp> <20080409131151.GK11962@parisc-linux.org> <200804112312.HGE69734.LFOOHQOSFFMJtV@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> <20080411143013.GB11962@parisc-linux.org> <4802B63F.2010804@crispincowan.com> <20080414134858.GV11962@parisc-linux.org> <48041F46.8030004@crispincowan.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48041F46.8030004@crispincowan.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 08:21:42PM -0700, Crispin Cowan wrote: > See above. The major classes of things that namespaces can't do are: > > * deliberate overlap How do you think new namespaces are created[1] and how, in your opinion, do they look right after that? [1] no, "openvz crowd posts a patch revealing yet another offense against Occam's Razor" is not the right answer to this question.