From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: zaitcev@redhat.com
Subject: X or AF_UNIX and order 3 allocation
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 21:10:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080415211055.882e67fe.zaitcev@redhat.com> (raw)
Hi, Guys:
Not sure if the problem is caused by X or kernel, but this is what
happened:
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: Xorg: page allocation failure. order:3, mode:0x4020
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: Pid: 2399, comm: Xorg Not tainted 2.6.25-0.195.rc8.git1.fc9.x86_64 #1
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel:
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: Call Trace:
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: <IRQ> [__alloc_pages+931/963] __alloc_pages+0x3a3/0x3c3
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: [unfreeze_slab+112/179] ? unfreeze_slab+0x70/0xb3
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: [alloc_pages_current+256/265] alloc_pages_current+0x100/0x109
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: [new_slab+74/585] new_slab+0x4a/0x249
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: [__slab_alloc+593/1248] __slab_alloc+0x251/0x4e0
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: [__netdev_alloc_skb+49/79] ? __netdev_alloc_skb+0x31/0x4f
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: [__kmalloc_node_track_caller+138/226] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x8a/0xe2
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: [sched_clock+80/109] ? native_sched_clock+0x50/0x6d
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: [__netdev_alloc_skb+49/79] ? __netdev_alloc_skb+0x31/0x4f
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: [__alloc_skb+111/309] __alloc_skb+0x6f/0x135
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: [__netdev_alloc_skb+49/79] __netdev_alloc_skb+0x31/0x4f
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: [_end+108612744/2109740072] :b44:b44_alloc_rx_skb+0x43/0x2c0
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: [_end+108621334/2109740072] :b44:b44_poll+0x240/0x4ea
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: [net_rx_action+217/526] net_rx_action+0xd9/0x20e
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: [__do_softirq+112/241] __do_softirq+0x70/0xf1
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: [call_softirq+28/40] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: [do_softirq+57/138] do_softirq+0x39/0x8a
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: [irq_exit+78/143] irq_exit+0x4e/0x8f
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: [do_IRQ+325/359] do_IRQ+0x145/0x167
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: [ret_from_intr+0/15] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xf
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: <EOI> [_spin_unlock_irqrestore+66/71] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x42/0x47
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: [add_wait_queue+55/64] ? add_wait_queue+0x37/0x40
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: [__pollwait+214/224] ? __pollwait+0xd6/0xe0
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: [unix_poll+35/164] ? unix_poll+0x23/0xa4
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: [sock_poll+24/26] ? sock_poll+0x18/0x1a
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: [do_select+841/1339] ? do_select+0x349/0x53b
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: [__pollwait+0/224] ? __pollwait+0x0/0xe0
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: [default_wake_function+0/15] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0xf
Apr 13 18:19:15 niphredil kernel:last message repeated 9 times
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: [core_sys_select+486/660] ? core_sys_select+0x1e6/0x294
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: [sched_clock+80/109] ? native_sched_clock+0x50/0x6d
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: [hrtimer_try_to_cancel+112/121] ? hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x70/0x79
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: [sched_clock+80/109] ? native_sched_clock+0x50/0x6d
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: [do_setitimer+387/805] ? do_setitimer+0x183/0x325
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: [lock_release_holdtime+30/264] ? lock_release_holdtime+0x1e/0x108
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: [_spin_unlock_irq+43/48] ? _spin_unlock_irq+0x2b/0x30
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: [trace_hardirqs_on+241/277] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xf1/0x115
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: [sys_select+181/343] ? sys_select+0xb5/0x157
Apr 13 18:19:14 niphredil kernel: [tracesys+213/218] ? tracesys+0xd5/0xda
-- Pete
next reply other threads:[~2008-04-16 4:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-16 4:10 Pete Zaitcev [this message]
2008-04-16 4:51 ` X or AF_UNIX and order 3 allocation David Miller
2008-04-16 15:52 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-04-16 16:59 ` Pete Zaitcev
2008-04-27 16:48 ` [ipw2100, b44] " Pekka Pietikainen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080415211055.882e67fe.zaitcev@redhat.com \
--to=zaitcev@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.