From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762705AbYDQOIA (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:08:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754840AbYDQOHv (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:07:51 -0400 Received: from lazybastard.de ([212.112.238.170]:52693 "EHLO longford.logfs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754564AbYDQOHu (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:07:50 -0400 Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:07:35 +0200 From: =?utf-8?B?SsO2cm4=?= Engel To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Alex Dubov , Ben Dooks , Linux kernel mailing list Subject: Re: Smartmedia/xd card support - request for comments Message-ID: <20080417140734.GA30001@logfs.org> References: <257448.48285.qm@web36701.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 17 April 2008 15:38:17 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > No it is not. SmardMedia is a bare NAND chip, which is already covered > by MTD. There are already other FTLs on top of MTD and the SmartMedia > format just can be added to those. Isn't drivers/mtd/ssfdc.c - despite its name - an implementation of the SmartMedia FTL? When I last looked at it, I failed to see any functional differences. Jörn -- Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is an absurd one. -- Voltaire