All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yang, Sheng" <sheng.yang@intel.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: MMU: Add EPT support
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 23:16:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200804182316.37306.sheng.yang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4808A266.2000701@codemonkey.ws>

On Friday 18 April 2008 21:30:14 Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Yang, Sheng wrote:
> > @@ -1048,17 +1071,18 @@ static void mmu_set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > u64 *shadow_pte,
> >  	 * whether the guest actually used the pte (in order to detect
> >  	 * demand paging).
> >  	 */
> > -	spte = PT_PRESENT_MASK | PT_DIRTY_MASK;
> > +	spte = shadow_base_present_pte | shadow_dirty_mask;
> >  	if (!speculative)
> >  		pte_access |= PT_ACCESSED_MASK;
> >  	if (!dirty)
> >  		pte_access &= ~ACC_WRITE_MASK;
> > -	if (!(pte_access & ACC_EXEC_MASK))
> > -		spte |= PT64_NX_MASK;
> > -
> > -	spte |= PT_PRESENT_MASK;
> > +	if (pte_access & ACC_EXEC_MASK) {
> > +		if (shadow_x_mask)
> > +			spte |= shadow_x_mask;
> > +	} else if (shadow_nx_mask)
> > +		spte |= shadow_nx_mask;
>
> This looks like it may be a bug.  The old behavior sets NX if
> (pte_access & ACC_EXEC_MASK).  The new behavior unconditionally sets NX
> and never sets PRESENT.  Also, the if (shadow_x_mas k) checks are
> unnecessary.  spte |= 0 is a nop.

Thanks for the comment! I realized two judgments of shadow_nx/x_mask is 
unnecessary... In fact, the correct behavior is either set shadow_x_mask or 
shadow_nx_mask, may be there is a better approach for this. The logic assured 
by program itself is always safer. But I will remove the redundant code at 
first.

But I don't think it's a bug. The old behavior set NX if (!(pte_access & 
ACC_EXEC_MASK)), the same as the new one. And I also curious about the 
PRESENT bit. You see, the PRESENT bit was set at the beginning of the code, 
and I really don't know why the duplicate one exists there... 

>
> >  	if (pte_access & ACC_USER_MASK)
> > -		spte |= PT_USER_MASK;
> > +		spte |= shadow_user_mask;
> >  	if (largepage)
> >  		spte |= PT_PAGE_SIZE_MASK;

-- 
Thanks
Yang, Sheng

>
> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-18 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-18  9:29 [PATCH 3/6] KVM: MMU: Add EPT support Yang, Sheng
2008-04-18 13:30 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-04-18 15:16   ` Yang, Sheng [this message]
2008-04-18 15:54     ` Anthony Liguori
2008-04-20 13:51       ` Yang, Sheng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200804182316.37306.sheng.yang@intel.com \
    --to=sheng.yang@intel.com \
    --cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.