From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Daniel P. Berrange" Subject: Re: RFC: removing figlet source from Xen Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:24:21 +0100 Message-ID: <20080421182421.GI31853@redhat.com> References: <480CCF63.5010607@virtualiron.com> Reply-To: "Daniel P. Berrange" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Keir Fraser Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Ben Guthro List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 07:08:28PM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote: > What a rathole this could be. Let's cache the figlet output across builds > and add a 'make tarball' target which for now just: > 1. Runs figlet. > 2. Deletes figlet. > 3. tar czf ... Can't we just remove figlet completely & avoid the huge banner for the version number. Its not like anyone really watches/needs that stuff. Dan. -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, Boston -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|