From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762143AbYDUTwX (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:52:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754505AbYDUTwI (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:52:08 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:43035 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755037AbYDUTwG (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:52:06 -0400 Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:51:48 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: James Bottomley Cc: Adrian Bunk , Alexey Starikovskiy , tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Voyager phys_cpu_present_map compile error Message-ID: <20080421195148.GG8770@elte.hu> References: <20080421000238.GD26897@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <20080421085314.GI26897@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <20080421120054.GA6788@elte.hu> <1208793533.3640.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1208793533.3640.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * James Bottomley wrote: > > thanks, the three patches below should fix it. > > > > i ended up excluding Voyager configs from our test space some time > > ago (and VISWS as well - there's one more visws fix in x86.git), > > that's how this broke. These subarchitectures seem not to be used at > > all and the code wont boot on normal PCs. We could mark it BROKEN > > but the fix seems simple in any case. > > The voyager pieces of this code look fine to me. I can't test at the > moment because we're having the carpets cleaned and I can't get down > into the cellar where the systems are, but I'll do so shortly. ok, that's good enough - that's why i excluded it from the auto-qa test-space as well. Adrian, could you please remove it from your config testset as well? If a user enables that config option it wont boot anyway so it's not a problem in practice. Ingo