From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Richard Jonsson <richie@coderworld.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Subject: Re: [git pull] scheduler changes for v2.6.26
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:59:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080422085905.GA9939@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1208854300.4695.7.camel@marge.simson.net>
* Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:
> > the 700-800 msecs of delays you see are very "brutal" so there must
> > be something fundamentally wrong going on here.
>
> I'm seeing latency hits with 26.git, whereas 25 is hit free.
ok. I think what happens is that your broken sched-clock hid the real
breakage. Lets try fix the real breakage now.
I've uploaded a new sched-devel.git that is against very latest -git,
could you try ftrace (with a sufficiently large
/debug/tracing/tracing_max_entries value) - perhaps the
worst-case-wakeup-latency tracer shows large latencies? If not, then
maybe the sched_switch tracer gives a better insight into what's
happening?
> Erm, should my Q6600 emit such?
on nohz it could happen - and fixed in -git. Patch looked too dangerous
for late-2.6.25 to merge.
> On 26.git, I get numbers like yours, but with occasional dips down to
> ~700, though the latency hits don't _seem_ to be synchronous with
> watch-rq-clock.sh glitchies.
hm, the dips shouldnt be happening normally.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-22 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-19 18:13 [git pull] scheduler changes for v2.6.26 Ingo Molnar
2008-04-19 18:47 ` Guillaume Chazarain
2008-04-19 18:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-19 18:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-19 19:47 ` Frans Pop
2008-04-21 12:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-21 16:31 ` Frans Pop
2008-04-21 19:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-22 8:51 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-04-22 8:59 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-04-22 9:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-22 12:25 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-04-23 8:11 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-04-23 10:30 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-04-23 11:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-23 13:27 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-04-22 9:41 ` Kevin Winchester
2008-04-22 10:49 ` David Miller
2008-04-22 11:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-23 9:36 ` Frans Pop
2008-04-23 9:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-23 9:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-23 13:36 ` Frans Pop
2008-04-29 12:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-29 15:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-04-23 16:23 ` Frans Pop
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080422085905.GA9939@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=elendil@planet.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richie@coderworld.net \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.