From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [VTD] Separate VT-d page table from P2M table
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:40:01 +0100
Message-ID: <20080422094001.GI4416@implementation.uk.xensource.com>
References: <08DF4D958216244799FC84F3514D70F00145BF7A@pdsmsx415.ccr.corp.intel.com>
	<C4336BAD.1FDBE%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
	<08DF4D958216244799FC84F3514D70F00145BFB2@pdsmsx415.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <08DF4D958216244799FC84F3514D70F00145BFB2@pdsmsx415.ccr.corp.intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: "Han, Weidong" <weidong.han@intel.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, "Kay, Allen M" <allen.m.kay@intel.com>, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>, "Xu,
	Anthony" <anthony.xu@intel.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Han, Weidong, le Tue 22 Apr 2008 17:34:11 +0800, a écrit :
> Separate VT-d page table is by default. Shared VT-d page table may be
> easy and good in some cases. So we let them co-exist now. If shared VT-d
> page table is not necessary and useless, we can remove it easily in
> future.

But why unsharing it at all?  Is there any bonus except using more
memory? :)

Samuel