From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kyle McMartin Subject: Re: [RFC] Introduce __ARCH_WANT_SYS_SYSFS Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:24:26 -0400 Message-ID: <20080422152426.GG19802@phobos.i.cabal.ca> References: <87a5b0800804220513t75690ceao938a288596b5ad0c@mail.gmail.com> <20080422081211.e85989ec.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <87a5b0800804220816y72a7f4f9gec2111df08a1a57f@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87a5b0800804220816y72a7f4f9gec2111df08a1a57f-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: To: Will Newton Cc: Randy Dunlap , Linux Kernel list , linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 04:16:17PM +0100, Will Newton wrote: > It can be done with Kconfig. Whether it should be or not depends on > your point of view, hence RFC. Currently __ARCH_WANT macros is the way > syscalls are enabled and disabled across architectures. If there's > consensus that it should be done via Kconfig that could certainly be > implmented, but that's a different patch. > It's currently done in unistd.h for hysterical raisins. All new conditional syscalls have been done in Kconfig. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from 206-248-169-182.dsl.ncf.ca ([206.248.169.182]:39554 "EHLO phobos.cabal.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760899AbYDVPY1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:24:27 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:24:26 -0400 From: Kyle McMartin Subject: Re: [RFC] Introduce __ARCH_WANT_SYS_SYSFS Message-ID: <20080422152426.GG19802@phobos.i.cabal.ca> References: <87a5b0800804220513t75690ceao938a288596b5ad0c@mail.gmail.com> <20080422081211.e85989ec.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <87a5b0800804220816y72a7f4f9gec2111df08a1a57f@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87a5b0800804220816y72a7f4f9gec2111df08a1a57f@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Will Newton Cc: Randy Dunlap , Linux Kernel list , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20080422152426.YsZXEWsl_fUs8Bo_icbK00lnm1uzrBY9bFXAhOqXCs8@z> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 04:16:17PM +0100, Will Newton wrote: > It can be done with Kconfig. Whether it should be or not depends on > your point of view, hence RFC. Currently __ARCH_WANT macros is the way > syscalls are enabled and disabled across architectures. If there's > consensus that it should be done via Kconfig that could certainly be > implmented, but that's a different patch. > It's currently done in unistd.h for hysterical raisins. All new conditional syscalls have been done in Kconfig.