From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kyle McMartin Subject: Re: [RFC] Introduce __ARCH_WANT_SYS_SYSFS Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:42:16 -0400 Message-ID: <20080422154216.GI19802@phobos.i.cabal.ca> References: <87a5b0800804220513t75690ceao938a288596b5ad0c@mail.gmail.com> <20080422152122.GF19802@phobos.i.cabal.ca> <200804221738.19635.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200804221738.19635.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Kyle McMartin , Will Newton , Linux Kernel list , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 05:38:19PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 22 April 2008, Kyle McMartin wrote: > >=20 > > This should (imnsho, at least), > > =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A01 - Add a cond_syscall for sys_sysfs to sys= _ni.c > > =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A02 - Use a CONFIG_EMBEDDED dependent option = that defaults on, > > =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 =A0 =A0possibly depend on BLACKFIN if you = really want to. > >=20 > > Adding this junk to every arch header is, in my opinion, completely > > unacceptable just because blackfin wants to be different. >=20 > It's not that they want to be different, but rather that I (among oth= ers) > requested that they don't implement obsolete syscalls, so they remove= d it > from their syscall table. >=20 Ah, I stupidly assumed sys_sysfs was something to do with /sys. regards, Kyle