All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.25: Weird IPv4 stack behaviour, IPv6 is fine
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:31:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080428093130.GA1011@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48157685.1040709@openvz.org>

On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:02:29AM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> > Lastly, in /proc/net/snmp on lists, I find:
> > 
> > Ip: Forwarding DefaultTTL InReceives InHdrErrors InAddrErrors ForwDatagrams InUnknownProtos InDiscards InDelivers OutRequests OutDiscards OutNoRoutes ReasmTimeout ReasmReqds ReasmOKs ReasmFails FragOKs FragFails FragCreates
> > Ip: 2 64 12771 0 0 0 0 0 5159 6262 9 0 2 8172 1363 2 922 0 5520
> 
> Can you please also show the /proc/net/netstat contents - I'm interested
> in IpExt statistics.

IpExt: InNoRoutes InTruncatedPkts InMcastPkts OutMcastPkts InBcastPkts OutBcastPkts
IpExt: 0 0 0 0 0 0

I suspect that you were expecting these to be non-zero.

I've just added some debug printks into ip_input.c, and I don't think the
IP stack itself is at fault (if it were, you'd be flooded with reports.)

int ip_local_deliver(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
...
if (ip_hdr(skb)->saddr == htonl(0xc0a80043) &&
    ip_hdr(skb)->protocol == IPPROTO_ICMP) printk("ping 2\n");
        return NF_HOOK(PF_INET, NF_INET_LOCAL_IN, skb, skb->dev, NULL,
                       ip_local_deliver_finish);
}

static int ip_local_deliver_finish(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
        __skb_pull(skb, ip_hdrlen(skb));

        /* Point into the IP datagram, just past the header. */
        skb_reset_transport_header(skb);

if (ip_hdr(skb)->saddr == htonl(0xc0a80043) &&
    ip_hdr(skb)->protocol == IPPROTO_ICMP) printk("ping 3\n");

When the machine stops responding to pings, I see in the kernel message
log 'ping 2' but no 'ping 3' (whereas I get both when it does respond.)

I don't have the iptables binary installed, so there aren't any rules.
(Also, the iptables_filter module isn't loaded.)

I'll see if I can track the packet's progress through the netfilter code
today.

-- 
Russell King

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-28  9:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-27 23:14 2.6.25: Weird IPv4 stack behaviour, IPv6 is fine Russell King
2008-04-27 23:17 ` Russell King
2008-04-27 23:26 ` David Miller
2008-04-28  7:02 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-04-28  9:31   ` Russell King [this message]
2008-04-28 10:18     ` Russell King
2008-04-28 10:30       ` David Miller
2008-04-28 12:00         ` Russell King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080428093130.GA1011@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xemul@openvz.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.