From: Daniel Klaffenbach <danielklaffenbach@gmail.com>
To: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Cc: "Len Brown" <lenb@kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [2.6.25-stable PATCH] regression: powertop says 120K wakeups/sec
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:01:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200804282001.06680.danielklaffenbach@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <924EFEDD5F540B4284297C4DC59F3DEEF31621@orsmsx423.amr.corp.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1921 bytes --]
Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
> Did C1, C2 work fine with 2.6.24?
> Can you send me the full dmesg when it is failing to enter C1, C2 with
> latest git + patch.
> Output of
> #grep . /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpuidle/*/*
> And also attach the acpidump output (pmtools package here
> http://www.lesswatts.org/projects/acpi/utilities.php)
No, C1/C2 did not seem to work with 2.6.24 - at least powertop reported 99,9%
C0 usage. It was the same behavior as after applying the wakeup patch.
However in 2.6.25 and 2.6.25-git11 C1/C2 worked correctly and C2 showed up in
pt. But after applying your patch to 2.6.25-git11 they did not:
git11:
PowerTOP version 1.9 (C) 2007 Intel Corporation
Cn Avg residency P-states (frequencies)
C0 (cpu running) ( 9,4%) 1,80 Ghz 100,0%
C1 0,0ms ( 0,0%) 1,60 Ghz 0,0%
C2 0,4ms (90,6%) 800 Mhz 0,0%
Wakeups-from-idle per second : 9051,0 interval: 5,0s
git11 with wakeup-patch:
PowerTOP version 1.9 (C) 2007 Intel Corporation
Cn Avg residency P-states (frequencies)
C0 (cpu running) (99,9%) 1,80 Ghz 100,0%
C1 0,0ms ( 0,0%) 1,60 Ghz 0,0%
C2 0,2ms ( 0,1%) 800 Mhz 0,0%
Wakeups-from-idle per second : 59,8 interval: 10,0s
In both cases the system was idle. I've uploaded the files you wanted:
http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~klada/misc/kernel/cpuidle_git11.txt
http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~klada/misc/kernel/cpuidle_git11_wakeuppatch.txt
http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~klada/misc/kernel/dmesg_git11.txt
http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~klada/misc/kernel/dmesg_git11_wakeuppatch.txt
http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~klada/misc/kernel/nx6125_acpidump.out
If there is anything else I can do for debugging this issue please let me
know.
- Daniel
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-28 18:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-25 0:15 [2.6.25-stable PATCH] regression: powertop says 120K wakeups/sec Len Brown
2008-04-26 1:51 ` [stable] " Greg KH
2008-04-28 10:09 ` Daniel Klaffenbach
2008-04-28 16:36 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-04-28 18:01 ` Daniel Klaffenbach [this message]
2008-04-28 21:13 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-04-28 21:39 ` Ray Lee
2008-04-29 9:14 ` Daniel Klaffenbach
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200804282001.06680.danielklaffenbach@gmail.com \
--to=danielklaffenbach@gmail.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.