From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Cc: rdunlap@xenotime.net, rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk, bunk@kernel.org,
den@openvz.org, linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org,
adobriyan@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pcmcia_ioctl.c compile error
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:09:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080429140926.bb763630.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1209502988.24729.31.camel@brick>
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:03:07 -0700
Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 13:59 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:17:04 +0100 Russell King wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 09:27:10PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > > Commit 9c37066d888bf6e1b96ad12304971b3ddeabbad0 (proc: remove proc_bus)
> > > > came through -mm that contains a patch implementing the overdue removal
> > > > of the PCMCIA control ioctl that did not yet make it into Linus' tree:
> > >
> > > Okay, this means at least one of my platforms is now dead as far as
> > > building new kernels for it, and nothing I can do about that. Ho hum.
> >
> > I don't get it. Several of us had building problems for a few
> > days with some pasic driver. We posted some bug reports and
> > some patches, but we put up with it for a few days...
> >
>
> I believe Russell is referring to the removal of the ioctl, not the
> compile breakage.
>
That would be interesting information (although I have a vague feeling that
it has been discussed before).
I've been sitting on pcmcia-delete-obsolete-pcmcia_ioctl-feature.patch for
over a year, mainly waiting for Dominik to reappear and decide what to do
about it.
I could just drop it, shrug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-29 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-29 18:27 pcmcia_ioctl.c compile error Adrian Bunk
2008-04-29 18:38 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-29 20:17 ` Russell King
2008-04-29 20:59 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-04-29 21:03 ` Harvey Harrison
2008-04-29 21:07 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-04-29 21:09 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-04-29 21:15 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-04-29 21:38 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-29 21:56 ` Russell King
2008-04-29 22:12 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-29 22:04 ` Alan Cox
2008-04-29 21:14 ` Russell King
2008-04-29 21:17 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-04-29 21:58 ` Alan Cox
2008-04-29 22:35 ` Russell King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080429140926.bb763630.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=den@openvz.org \
--cc=harvey.harrison@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.