From: Mike Anderson <andmike@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alasdair Graeme Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Optimize lock in queue unplugging
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:29:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080429202928.GB10641@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080429192556.GB12774@kernel.dk>
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29 2008, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Mike Anderson was doing an OLTP benchmark on a computer with 48 physical
> > disks mapped to one logical device via device mapper.
> >
> > He found that there was a slowdown on request_queue->lock in function
> > generic_unplug_device. The slowdown is caused by the fact that when some
> > code calls unplug on the device mapper, device mapper calls unplug on all
> > physical disks. These unplug calls take the lock, find that the queue is
> > already unplugged, release the lock and exit.
> >
> > With the below patch, performance of the benchmark was increased by 18%
> > (the whole OLTP application, not just block layer microbenchmarks).
> >
> > So I'm submitting this patch for upstream. I think the patch is correct,
> > because when more threads call simultaneously plug and unplug, it is
> > unspecified, if the queue is or isn't plugged (so the patch can't make
> > this worse). And the caller that plugged the queue should unplug it
> > anyway. (if it doesn't, there's 3ms timeout).
>
> Where were these unplug calls coming from? The block layer will
> generally only unplug when it is already unplugged, so if you are seeing
> so many unplug calls that the patch redues overhead by as much
> described, perhaps the callsite is buggy?
I do not have direct access the the benchmark setup, but here is the data
I have received.
The oprofile data was showing ll_rw_blk::generic_unplug_device() as a top
routine at 13% of the samples. Annotation of the samples shows hits on
spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock).
Here are some sample call traces:
Call trace #1
kernel: [<ffffffff80058c6c>] generic_unplug_device+0x5d/0xc6
kernel: [<ffffffff8820ea3e>] :dm_mod:dm_table_unplug_all+0x33/0x41
kernel: [<ffffffff8820cc85>] :dm_mod:dm_unplug_all+0x1d/0x28
kernel: [<ffffffff8005a78a>] blk_backing_dev_unplug+0x56/0x5b
kernel: [<ffffffff80014cdc>] sync_buffer+0x36/0x3f
kernel: [<ffffffff800629a4>] __wait_on_bit+0x40/0x6f
kernel: [<ffffffff80014ca6>] sync_buffer+0x0/0x3f
kernel: [<ffffffff80062a3f>] out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x6c/0x78
kernel: [<ffffffff8009c474>] wake_bit_function+0x0/0x23
kernel: [<ffffffff88034c85>] :jbd:journal_commit_transaction+0x91f/0x1086
kernel: [<ffffffff8003d038>] lock_timer_base+0x1b/0x3c
kernel: [<ffffffff8803840e>] :jbd:kjournald+0xc1/0x213
kernel: [<ffffffff8009c446>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e
kernel: [<ffffffff8009c283>] keventd_create_kthread+0x0/0x61
kernel: [<ffffffff8803834d>] :jbd:kjournald+0x0/0x213
kernel: [<ffffffff8009c283>] keventd_create_kthread+0x0/0x61
kernel: [<ffffffff800321d5>] kthread+0xfe/0x132
kernel: [<ffffffff8005cfb1>] child_rip+0xa/0x11
kernel: [<ffffffff8009c283>] keventd_create_kthread+0x0/0x61
kernel: [<ffffffff800320d7>] kthread+0x0/0x132
kernel: [<ffffffff8005cfa7>] child_rip+0x0/0x11
Call trace #2
kernel: [<ffffffff80058c6c>] generic_unplug_device+0x5d/0xc6
kernel: [<ffffffff8820ea3e>] :dm_mod:dm_table_unplug_all+0x33/0x41
kernel: [<ffffffff8820cc85>] :dm_mod:dm_unplug_all+0x1d/0x28
kernel: [<ffffffff8005a78a>] blk_backing_dev_unplug+0x56/0x5b
kernel: [<ffffffff800e8bfe>] __blockdev_direct_IO+0x889/0xaa2
kernel: [<ffffffff88050800>] :ext3:ext3_direct_IO+0xf3/0x18b
kernel: [<ffffffff8804ec84>] :ext3:ext3_get_block+0x0/0xe3
kernel: [<ffffffff800be6bb>] generic_file_direct_IO+0xbd/0xfb
kernel: [<ffffffff8001e637>] generic_file_direct_write+0x60/0xf2
kernel: [<ffffffff80015cfd>] __generic_file_aio_write_nolock+0x2b7/0x3b8
kernel: [<ffffffff8002134f>] generic_file_aio_write+0x65/0xc1
kernel: [<ffffffff8804c192>] :ext3:ext3_file_write+0x16/0x91
kernel: [<ffffffff80017944>] do_sync_write+0xc7/0x104
kernel: [<ffffffff8009c446>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e
kernel: [<ffffffff80111400>] free_msg+0x22/0x3c
kernel: [<ffffffff800161c4>] vfs_write+0xce/0x174
kernel: [<ffffffff8004194c>] sys_pwrite64+0x50/0x70
kernel: [<ffffffff8005cde9>] error_exit+0x0/0x84
kernel: [<ffffffff8005c116>] system_call+0x7e/0x83
-andmike
--
Michael Anderson
andmike@linux.vnet.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-29 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-29 19:12 [PATCH] Optimize lock in queue unplugging Mikulas Patocka
2008-04-29 19:25 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-29 20:02 ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-04-29 20:05 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-29 20:29 ` Mike Anderson [this message]
2008-04-30 7:14 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-30 10:38 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2008-04-30 13:54 ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-05-04 19:11 ` Jens Axboe
2008-05-05 4:01 ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-05-07 7:45 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080429202928.GB10641@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=andmike@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.