From: Gautam Iyer <gi1242@stanford.edu>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: b43 LED status (was Re: b43 reduced performance in Linux-2.6.25)
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:05:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080430010502.GA17871@stanford.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4817B548.30303@lwfinger.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1165 bytes --]
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 06:54:48PM -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
>> I don't have Windows so can't compare to it. But even though I use b43
>> by default, I sometimes have to revert to ndiswrapper on weak signals or
>> large file transfers. Also ndiswrapper has the power management and
>> LED's working correctly, which I could not get working with the b43
>> driver.
>
> What LEDS does your interface, and what do they not do? If the only
> LED you have is the one attached to the rfkill switch, then you have
> not properly configured the LED parameters.
Yes, the only LED I have is attached to my rfkill switch. It becomes
blue when I load the b43 kernel module, and becomes red when I unload
it. I was hoping I could set it so that it becomes blue when in use
(i.e. associated), and red otherwise. (This happens with ndiswrapper).
I remember messing with the LED power / brightness files in /sys. But
nothing I echoed in there changed the state of the LED. Is there some
parameter I'm missing?
Thanks,
GI
--
Twenty Ways To Maintain A Healthy Level of Insanity
7. Finish all your sentences with "In Accordance with the Prophecy."
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-30 1:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-29 21:56 b43 reduced performance in Linux-2.6.25 Gautam Iyer
2008-04-29 22:34 ` Larry Finger
2008-04-29 23:30 ` Gautam Iyer
2008-04-29 23:54 ` Larry Finger
2008-04-30 1:05 ` Gautam Iyer [this message]
2008-04-30 3:05 ` b43 LED status (was Re: b43 reduced performance in Linux-2.6.25) Larry Finger
2008-04-30 7:41 ` b43 LED status Gautam Iyer
2008-04-30 18:00 ` b43 reduced performance in Linux-2.6.25 Gautam Iyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080430010502.GA17871@stanford.edu \
--to=gi1242@stanford.edu \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.