From: "Hans J. Koch" <hjk-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Trent Piepho <xyzzy-zY4eFNvK5D+xbKUeIHjxjQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: Two start conditions for PCA9554
Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 22:39:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080501203936.GD3210@local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0804301422140.9894-13q4cmjDBaTP3RPoUHIrnuTW4wlIGRCZ@public.gmane.org>
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 02:26:22PM -0700, Trent Piepho wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Hans J. Koch wrote:
> > I have an embedded board with a PCA9554 on it. It's an 8-bit IO expander
> > similar to the PCF8574 in mainline. One difference is that when reading
> > from the inputs, you have to do the following:
> >
> > - start condition
> > - send slave address, R/W=0
> > - send command (0x00 = read input register)
> > - issue another start condition (!)
> > - send slave address, R/W=1
> > - read data
> > - stop condition
> >
> > Can such a protocol be handled by the i2c subsystem?
>
> Yes. That is a normal repeated start transaction, and AFAIK exactly what
> all the other PCA, and virtually every other i2c chip for that matter, use.
> The smbus read byte data function will do this for you.
OK, thanks. I admit, I would be strange if the i2c subsystem didn't
support that.
>
> If you want multiple stops in a single transaction, the i2c subsystem can't
> do it, but I wrote a simple patch that allows it.
No need for that now, but I'll remember that...
Thanks,
Hans
_______________________________________________
i2c mailing list
i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-01 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-29 13:11 Two start conditions for PCA9554 Hans J. Koch
2008-04-30 21:26 ` Trent Piepho
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0804301422140.9894-13q4cmjDBaTP3RPoUHIrnuTW4wlIGRCZ@public.gmane.org>
2008-05-01 20:39 ` Hans J. Koch [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-05-01 6:01 David Brownell
[not found] ` <200804302301.56732.david-b-yBeKhBN/0LDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
2008-05-01 20:35 ` Hans J. Koch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080501203936.GD3210@local \
--to=hjk-hfztesqfncyowbw4kg4ksq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=xyzzy-zY4eFNvK5D+xbKUeIHjxjQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.