From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934368AbYEBL4p (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2008 07:56:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759985AbYEBL4i (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2008 07:56:38 -0400 Received: from ausxipps301.us.dell.com ([143.166.148.223]:14761 "EHLO ausxipps301.us.dell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757724AbYEBL4h (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2008 07:56:37 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: s=smtpout; d=dell.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID: References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition: In-Reply-To:User-Agent; b=jH47B70FDin4U8jfs63R5jesKcDhX00+eroddahKxPTzZVFt8QdRO+9w DcGzTguYMrH4eZuc6Omnx/Z5i/T7s/vOiv5T/ZZDI6NC4RdTXiJCLLEi8 MMEKhi4eAXjwaGB; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,426,1204524000"; d="scan'208";a="34890643" Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 06:56:11 -0500 From: Matt Domsch To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, muli@il.ibm.com, davej@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, bunk@kernel.org, linux-bugs@dell.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, greg@kroah.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix x86 DMI checks for PCI quirks Message-ID: <20080502115611.GA15645@auslistsprd01.us.dell.com> References: <20080502025427.GA23757@auslistsprd01.us.dell.com> <20080501042313.4ce14c0d@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080501042313.4ce14c0d@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 04:23:13AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Thu, 1 May 2008 21:54:27 -0500 > Matt Domsch wrote: > > > > This patch moves the DMI tests into its own file, arch/x86/pci/dmi.c, > > and invokes them via subsys_initcall() before pci_acpi_init(), > > pci_legacy_init(), and pcibios_init() are called, which may rely upon > > these tests having been executed. > > > Hi, > > can we name this file something with "quirks" in it (dmi_quirks.c or > so)? At least I tend to look for files named like that when searching > for places that do specific hardware/machine based workarounds... sure, the file name matters not much to me in this regard, and I can see your point. -- Matt Domsch Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux