From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753914AbYEDXOS (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 May 2008 19:14:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751156AbYEDXOE (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 May 2008 19:14:04 -0400 Received: from relay1.sgi.com ([192.48.171.29]:53036 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751114AbYEDXOD (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 May 2008 19:14:03 -0400 Date: Sun, 4 May 2008 18:13:59 -0500 From: Paul Jackson To: Cyrill Gorcunov Cc: hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu, ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] x86: x86-64defconfig remake Message-Id: <20080504181359.a39d766b.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20080504155719.GA6842@cvg> References: <20080504155719.GA6842@cvg> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.12.0; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cyrill wrote: > The current x86_64_defconfig contains a number of nonexistent > symbols. These symbols don't exist in what context? The one I notice: -# CONFIG_CPUSETS is not set certainly exists, in init/Kconfig: config CPUSETS bool "Cpuset support" depends on SMP && CGROUPS and is enabled by default in some configs: arch/ia64/configs/sn2_defconfig arch/mips/configs/ip27_defconfig arch/mips/configs/sb1250-swarm_defconfig arch/powerpc/configs/cell_defconfig arch/powerpc/configs/ppc64_defconfig arch/powerpc/configspseries_defconfig I could be tempted to enable cpusets by default in x86_64 as well, however I don't understand the tradeoffs of such a change well enough to know if I should propose that. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.940.382.4214