From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JtVEN-0005mI-5O for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 06 May 2008 15:01:51 -0700 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1JtVEL-0001Ge-Rm for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 06 May 2008 15:01:51 -0700 Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 15:01:26 -0700 From: Andrew Morton Message-Id: <20080506150126.c849afa0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080506214435.GA12998@c2.user-mode-linux.org> References: <20080425175613.GA11192@c2.user-mode-linux.org> <877iegcx11.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> <20080429202924.GA13602@c2.user-mode-linux.org> <20080506134655.4cac1014.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080506214435.GA12998@c2.user-mode-linux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 11/19] UML - Track and make up lost ticks List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Jeff Dike Cc: nix@esperi.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Tue, 6 May 2008 17:44:35 -0400 Jeff Dike wrote: > On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 01:46:55PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > This fix was already present in your "[PATCH 4/19] UML - Random driver fixes". > > Ah, so that's where it ended up. Strange that the bug has always been there. Some other change made it apparent? > > Perhaps we broke bisection? > > No doubt. Drop those two and I'll send fixed ones. OK. uml-random-driver-style-fixes.patch needed to go also. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932528AbYEFWCU (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2008 18:02:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756277AbYEFWBw (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2008 18:01:52 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:58144 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753605AbYEFWBv (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2008 18:01:51 -0400 Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 15:01:26 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Jeff Dike Cc: nix@esperi.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 11/19] UML - Track and make up lost ticks Message-Id: <20080506150126.c849afa0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080506214435.GA12998@c2.user-mode-linux.org> References: <20080425175613.GA11192@c2.user-mode-linux.org> <877iegcx11.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> <20080429202924.GA13602@c2.user-mode-linux.org> <20080506134655.4cac1014.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080506214435.GA12998@c2.user-mode-linux.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 6 May 2008 17:44:35 -0400 Jeff Dike wrote: > On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 01:46:55PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > This fix was already present in your "[PATCH 4/19] UML - Random driver fixes". > > Ah, so that's where it ended up. Strange that the bug has always been there. Some other change made it apparent? > > Perhaps we broke bisection? > > No doubt. Drop those two and I'll send fixed ones. OK. uml-random-driver-style-fixes.patch needed to go also.