From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brownell Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.26-rc1] i2c_core: return -Errno not -1 Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 01:18:39 -0700 Message-ID: <200805070118.39969.david-b@pacbell.net> References: <18465.22635.646092.18578@ipc1.ka-ro> <20080507095209.32a6faa2@hyperion.delvare> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080507095209.32a6faa2-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: i2c-bounces-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: i2c-bounces-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org To: Jean Delvare Cc: i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org, Lothar =?iso-8859-1?q?Wa=DFmann?= List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 07 May 2008, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hmm, how does your patch differ from the one David Brownell sent a few > days ago? > > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/i2c/2008-May/003503.html Almost exactly the same title. ;) My version passes "checkpatch.pl --strict" as I recall. And some of the errno values are different ... I tried to avoid overusing EINVAL and EIO, and made PEC errors be unique. - Dave _______________________________________________ i2c mailing list i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c