From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jtaq5-0006aH-EG for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 06 May 2008 21:01:09 -0700 Received: from saraswathi.solana.com ([198.99.130.12]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1Jtaq3-0003Km-V0 for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 06 May 2008 21:01:09 -0700 Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 00:00:20 -0400 From: Jeff Dike Message-ID: <20080507040020.GA15972@c2.user-mode-linux.org> References: <200805062304.m46N4h6d007206@devserv.devel.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200805062304.m46N4h6d007206@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] fix UML on x86-64 List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Ulrich Drepper Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 07:04:43PM -0400, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > This patch breaks UML for me on x86-64 running Fedora 8 (gcc 4.1.2): Two odd things - I'm using what appears to be the same environment - F8, gcc 4.1.2 gcc version 4.1.2 20070925 (Red Hat 4.1.2-33) and I've seen nothing like this --showconfig doesn't work. This is implemented in arch/um/kernel/config.c.in (which becomes config.c after some preprocessing), and as far as I can tell, it's just not in the binary. So, I'm wondering whether there's something odd with __used. Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756803AbYEGEB6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 May 2008 00:01:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751498AbYEGEBa (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 May 2008 00:01:30 -0400 Received: from saraswathi.solana.com ([198.99.130.12]:44645 "EHLO saraswathi.solana.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750807AbYEGEB3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 May 2008 00:01:29 -0400 Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 00:00:20 -0400 From: Jeff Dike To: Ulrich Drepper Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] fix UML on x86-64 Message-ID: <20080507040020.GA15972@c2.user-mode-linux.org> References: <200805062304.m46N4h6d007206@devserv.devel.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200805062304.m46N4h6d007206@devserv.devel.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 07:04:43PM -0400, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > This patch breaks UML for me on x86-64 running Fedora 8 (gcc 4.1.2): Two odd things - I'm using what appears to be the same environment - F8, gcc 4.1.2 gcc version 4.1.2 20070925 (Red Hat 4.1.2-33) and I've seen nothing like this --showconfig doesn't work. This is implemented in arch/um/kernel/config.c.in (which becomes config.c after some preprocessing), and as far as I can tell, it's just not in the binary. So, I'm wondering whether there's something odd with __used. Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com