From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from s131.mittwaldmedien.de ([62.216.178.31]:15342 "EHLO
	s131.mittwaldmedien.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1761371AbYEHHJd (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 8 May 2008 03:09:33 -0400
From: Holger Schurig <hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: New GIT net tree naming...
Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 09:06:29 +0200
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, sfr@canb.auug.org.au,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
References: <20080419.173510.257216556.davem@davemloft.net> <20080508014358.GE3412@tuxdriver.com>
In-Reply-To: <20080508014358.GE3412@tuxdriver.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Message-Id: <200805080906.29603.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de> (sfid-20080508_090842_986294_1EAE318D)
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

> For changes against Linus's current tree:
...
> For development meant to be merged in the next merge
> window we have:

Is this relevant for us, the patch submitters?  Or should we 
continue to create patches against wireless-testing?