All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mark gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Gabriel C <nix.or.die@googlemail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ashok.raj@intel.com,
	shaohua.li@intel.com, anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com,
	jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Subject: Re: intel-iommu: CONFIG_DMAR*=y kills my box
Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 07:43:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080508144301.GA19589@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080506131554.4adb3f9c.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 01:15:54PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 01:04:45 +0200
> Gabriel C <nix.or.die@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> 
> Guys, it's really painful having to scroll through thousand-line emails to
> find a few lines of information.  Please trim stuff.
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > I do find it quite odd that a DMA code path specific to PCIE is somehow
> > > in the loop for a parallel port device.  Should this be possible?
> > 
> > I have no idea =) ( PCI folks added to CC )
> > 
> > > 
> > > I could easily be wrong so feel free to correct me but;
> > > I think your bios is goofy / unprepared to support IOMMU / VT-d and
> > > doing strange things with enumerated a parallel port on a PCIE bus with
> > > VTD is turned on...
> > 
> > I will contact ASUS peoples about the BIOS but it has for sure VT-d support and it is enabled.
> 
> So..  what happened here?  It seems like a pretty fatal problem, and
> personally I don't think that contacting vendors about BIOS upgrades is a
> suitable general solution.  It would be much better to find a kernel-based
> fix or workaround?
>

I just got some expert advice on this issue.  I will try again and look
for a problem with the iommu code getting executed before the USB / PCI
bus is fully initialized.

also, I just realized that I was attempting to reproduce the failure on
the MM tree, and re-reading the report I see its on the linux-next tree.

I'm retesting it this am.

--mgross

 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-05-08 14:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-26 14:21 intel-iommu: CONFIG_DMAR*=y kills my box Gabriel C
2008-04-26 17:27 ` Gabriel C
2008-04-29  0:29   ` mark gross
2008-04-29  1:20     ` Gabriel C
2008-04-29 22:53       ` mark gross
2008-04-29 23:04         ` Gabriel C
2008-05-06 20:15           ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-07 20:58             ` mark gross
2008-05-08 14:43             ` mark gross [this message]
2008-05-08 16:45               ` mark gross
2008-05-08 17:56                 ` Gabriel C
2008-05-08 18:55                   ` mark gross
2008-05-08 17:54   ` mark gross
2008-04-29  0:11 ` mark gross

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080508144301.GA19589@linux.intel.com \
    --to=mgross@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
    --cc=nix.or.die@googlemail.com \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.