From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Frank van Maarseveen <frankvm@frankvm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Linux NFS mailing list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] exportfs: fix incorrect EACCES in reconnect_path()
Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 00:34:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080509043425.GD21408@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18466.28013.258338.485948-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 01:03:09PM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Tuesday May 6, bfields@fieldses.org wrote:
> > On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 10:35:46AM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
> > >
> > > To fix the current bug properly, reconnect_path still needs to bypass
> > > normal permission checks even when subtree_check is in effect, so it
> > > can be sure of getting read permission on the parent directory.
> >
> > OK, but why not just forget the subtree_check case? It would be just
> > another item on the "reasons not to use subtree_check" list.
>
> I guess so.
>
> >
> > If a fix for the subtree checking case were easy (or if someone else had
> > the time to do a very careful job of it), then fine, but maybe we should
> > just fix the easy case and leave the subtree checking as is for now.
>
> So is this the proposed fix? A bit ugly, but I guess it's OK.
Something like that, yep. (Frank, can you confirm that this does the
job for you?)
It'd be nice if we could find a way to incorporate a little cleanup at
the same time, but I'm not sure exactly what to suggest.
--b.
>
> NeilBrown
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
>
> ### Diffstat output
> ./fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff .prev/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c ./fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c
> --- .prev/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c 2008-05-06 10:06:59.000000000 +1000
> +++ ./fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c 2008-05-08 13:01:06.000000000 +1000
> @@ -176,9 +176,24 @@ static __be32 nfsd_set_fh_dentry(struct
> if (IS_ERR(exp))
> return nfserrno(PTR_ERR(exp));
>
> - error = nfsd_setuser_and_check_port(rqstp, exp);
> - if (error)
> - goto out;
> + if (exp->ex_flags & NFSEXP_NOSUBTREECHECK) {
> + /* Elevate privileges so that the lack of 'r' or 'x'
> + * permission on some parent directory will
> + * not stop exportfs_decode_fh from being able
> + * to reconnect a directory into the dentry cache.
> + * The same problem can affect "SUBTREECHECK" exports,
> + * but as nfsd_acceptable depends on correct
> + * access control settings being in effect, we cannot
> + * fix that case easily - so though.
> + */
> + current->cap_effective =
> + cap_raise_nfsd_set(current->cap_effective,
> + current->cap_permitted);
> + } else {
> + error = nfsd_setuser_and_check_port(rqstp, exp);
> + if (error)
> + goto out;
> + }
>
> /*
> * Look up the dentry using the NFS file handle.
> @@ -215,6 +230,14 @@ static __be32 nfsd_set_fh_dentry(struct
> goto out;
> }
>
> + if (exp->ex_flags & NFSEXP_NOSUBTREECHECK) {
> + error = nfsd_setuser_and_check_port(rqstp, exp);
> + if (error) {
> + dput(dentry);
> + goto out;
> + }
> + }
> +
> if (S_ISDIR(dentry->d_inode->i_mode) &&
> (dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_DISCONNECTED)) {
> printk("nfsd: find_fh_dentry returned a DISCONNECTED directory: %s/%s\n",
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-09 4:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-04 10:24 reconnect_path() breaks NFS server causing occasional EACCES Frank van Maarseveen
2008-04-07 18:43 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-04-07 19:55 ` Frank van Maarseveen
2008-04-09 13:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-09 14:11 ` Frank van Maarseveen
2008-04-09 16:24 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-04-29 5:20 ` Neil Brown
[not found] ` <18454.45086.254692.412079-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-29 16:35 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-04-29 17:40 ` Frank van Maarseveen
2008-04-30 17:47 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-05-02 15:16 ` [PATCH] exportfs: fix incorrect EACCES in reconnect_path() Frank van Maarseveen
2008-05-02 15:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-02 15:56 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-05-02 16:04 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <1209744293.8294.19.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2008-05-02 22:12 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-05-04 23:22 ` Neil Brown
[not found] ` <18462.17737.353976.999538-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2008-05-05 17:47 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-05-06 0:35 ` Neil Brown
[not found] ` <18463.42978.531115.344884-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2008-05-06 19:50 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-05-08 3:03 ` Neil Brown
[not found] ` <18466.28013.258338.485948-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2008-05-09 4:34 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2008-05-09 10:11 ` Frank van Maarseveen
2008-06-29 19:27 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-05-03 8:52 ` Frank van Maarseveen
2008-04-30 23:29 ` reconnect_path() breaks NFS server causing occasional EACCES Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080509043425.GD21408@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=frankvm@frankvm.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.