From: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
toralf.foerster@gmx.de, James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: build issue #380 for v2.6.26-rc1-279-g28a4acb : mach-voyager: multiple definition of `phys_cpu_present_map'
Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 18:09:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080509100944.GK2543@hacking> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080509095837.GB19617@elte.hu>
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 11:58:37AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
>
>i've got the one below queued up but it's stalled as it could easily be
>wrong and there's no ack from James yet and there's been discussion back
>and forth. James, what do you suggest?
>
Well, 'phys_cpu_present_map' of arch/x86/mach-voyager/voyager_smp.c is
only used in arch/x86/mach-voyager/voyager_smp.c, other files under
arch/x86/mach-voyager/ not.
And there's also a global 'phys_cpu_present_map', and is widely used
by files under arch/x86/kernel/.
I check these two 'phys_cpu_present_map''s types, the one used by
arch/x86/kernel/ files is not the one defined in
arch/x86/mach-voyager/voyager_smp.c. So
'arch/x86/mach-voyager/voyager_smp.c::phys_cpu_present_map' should become
static.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-09 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-09 9:13 build issue #380 for v2.6.26-rc1-279-g28a4acb : mach-voyager: multiple definition of `phys_cpu_present_map' Toralf Förster
2008-05-09 9:30 ` WANG Cong
2008-05-09 9:58 ` Toralf Förster
2008-05-09 10:16 ` WANG Cong
2008-05-09 9:52 ` WANG Cong
2008-05-09 9:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-09 10:09 ` WANG Cong [this message]
2008-05-09 10:59 ` Toralf Förster
2008-05-09 11:22 ` WANG Cong
2008-05-09 14:22 ` James Bottomley
2008-05-09 14:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-09 15:01 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-05-10 13:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-10 14:01 ` James Bottomley
2008-05-10 14:21 ` James Bottomley
2008-05-10 14:34 ` WANG Cong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080509100944.GK2543@hacking \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=toralf.foerster@gmx.de \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.