From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1JuVh7-0004Jv-9X for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2008 12:43:41 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JuVh6-0004Jp-Ce for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2008 12:43:40 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JuVh2-0004ID-Tq for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2008 12:43:40 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34106 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JuVh2-0004IA-PV for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2008 12:43:36 -0400 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.246]:59880) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JuVh2-0002mP-C4 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 May 2008 12:43:36 -0400 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c38so263721ana.84 for ; Fri, 09 May 2008 09:43:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:x-face:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=HILktYmYY8BWKSjdFFd7+TUaryU67SfHWUkRGJoJYq0=; b=xMTso7rjiCawH7CbGDfozsnk9osvSLfOvE6haPDhIuGwUoZS848uDLLp6/1RU5pJeS0C9BXRAuVTgNjc/slv4lwjJyJqQLeJXmbAZ/8/+IGIcFzgDR03D6qtj0ZHTYQOrXYGVbaC7N1nRkiSEpPx0TF2ot+UjOaj6ykZ/PR+LaI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:x-face:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=PieFW0x2B25kefM0USyM3iJivSUFL9zJ9slsHyRv9WSnaoxCIRsm/ghsyY5i6lFrD5yWB2xbN03K6aIdt38ZuNCcD4eKzgyM7/0iXT45svUyhHJkX6L0A3qPhVpdR6cq0Z1Hjc+yDKWUyMXfzE0i9v7Vy7Ackxbexzx51eaL7VQ= Received: by 10.100.122.8 with SMTP id u8mr6021609anc.103.1210351411600; Fri, 09 May 2008 09:43:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dsktop01.iafcg.loc ( [190.75.165.30]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c13sm7951861anc.32.2008.05.09.09.43.30 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 09 May 2008 09:43:30 -0700 (PDT) From: "Isaac M. Marcos" To: grub-devel@gnu.org Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 12:13:24 -0430 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <200805080454.54578.isaacmarcos100010@gmail.com> <1210284927.9311.9.camel@dv> <20080509130200.GE3705@thorin> In-Reply-To: <20080509130200.GE3705@thorin> X-Face: x-y\t15800Zgk#"~:Drp1}fo=N%pB*F8(J'>p}vH!s^cOfk.OkJcPPD#tY{V}N3:"-2Y>=?utf-8?q?B=0A=09RudWYi=5BV?=(q[woD:$pX],WnaV2Pp"&mBYiTK3g}RJsiBFy3IGy'H+&N,g0%lZ5; $Ows7Zyv1D2r8s=]C=]6QHY=YyEr\; 1=F4C76~*(=?utf-8?q?2l=7B9=23=0A=09Z=5Db1dNIHPtCCvypAZi-0=5D=25kTcGn=27x8A=5C=5F-/?= =?utf-8?q?7PW8=60?= X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) Subject: Re: grub-probe gets a segfault X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 16:43:40 -0000 El Friday 09 May 2008 08:32:01 Robert Millan escribi=C3=B3: > On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 06:15:27PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 11:53 -0430, Isaac M. Marcos wrote: > > > Does: > > > # grub-probe -t device / > > > involve anything Debian specific ???????? > > > > It was a generic recommendation. But if grub-probe was compiled by > > Debian, it's Debian specific in a certain sense. > > I don't think there's any change in Debian affecting this area. But anyw= ay > I recommend that you follow Pavel's advice and run it from CVS directly. Yes, i will, but it would have to wait a bit. There are other things to do. > > I cannot reproduce the crash, even on a Fedora installed on a LVM > > volume. > > Neither could I :-( It does not happen in other two AMD64 machines here!! Only on this one. > > > Good, next step? > > I'm thinking that perhaps we can check the offset values against the boun= ds > of the structure we have allocated, and abort if they miss. We need to do > this anyway to support broken PVs, but I don't know if this is hiding a b= ug > in our code somewhere else. Could you hold your idea for a little time? Thanks. =2D-=20 Isaac M. Marcos