From: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Aneesh Kumar KV <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: volanoMark regression with kernel 2.6.26-rc1
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 07:34:02 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080512020402.GF15063@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1210556351.3151.2.camel@ymzhang>
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 09:39:10AM +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 21:22 +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> > On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 11:41:25AM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> > > The other combination that I am interested to know is when:
> > >
> > > CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED=y and CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED=y
> > >
> > > [i.e cgroup based scheduling rather than uid based scheduling. Former
> > > should result in only one group at bootup]
> > >
> > > I will also try to get some numbers with this combination.
> >
> > I ran with that combination and here are some results:
> >
> > 2.6.25 (with CONFIG_USER_SCHED)
> >
> > Volanomark perf = 20436.6 (Avg of 10 runs)
> >
> > 2.6.26-rc1 + patches in Ingo's tree [1] as of Fri morning IST (abt 8 hrs
> > before) (with CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED)
> >
> > Volanomark perf = 21529.6
> >
> > i.e CGROUP based grouping in 2.6.26-rc1 gives same (if not somewhat
> > better) results as UID-based scheduling in 2.6.25.
> >
> > Yamin,
> > Could you validate this as well? i.e just turn on cgroup-based
> > grouping (CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED) and check the resulting performance with 2625
> > you already have (using CONFIG_USER_SCHED).
> >
> >
> > A) In 2.6.25, with UID based scheduling,
> > CPU load = summation of task load
> >
> > B) In 2.6.26-rc1, with UID based scheduling,
> > CPU load = summation of group weights
> >
> > C) In 2.6.26-rc1, with CGROUP based scheduling,
> > CPU load = summation of task weights
> I'm confused by these conceptions. Would you like to tell me the exact config options
> you want to turn on?
>
> Options in my config file(both 2.6.25 and 2.6.26-rc1):
>
> # CONFIG_CGROUPS is not set
> CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED=y
> CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED=y
> # CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED is not set
> CONFIG_USER_SCHED=y
> # CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED is not set
>
This is fine for 2.6.25. For 2.6.26-rc1, can you turn off USER_SCHED adn
turn on CGROUP_SCHED?
--
regards,
Dhaval
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-12 2:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-06 2:06 volanoMark regression with kernel 2.6.26-rc1 Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-06 5:41 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-06 11:52 ` Dhaval Giani
2008-05-07 17:33 ` Dhaval Giani
2008-05-08 5:18 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-08 5:32 ` Dhaval Giani
2008-05-08 5:40 ` Dhaval Giani
2008-05-08 5:53 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-08 6:04 ` Dhaval Giani
2008-05-08 6:11 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-05-09 15:52 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-05-09 15:54 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-05-12 1:39 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-12 2:04 ` Dhaval Giani [this message]
2008-05-12 2:37 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-05-12 3:33 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-12 4:52 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-05-12 5:02 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-12 5:43 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-12 9:04 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-05-12 9:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-14 9:22 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-14 13:44 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-05-14 14:50 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-05-14 15:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-15 8:20 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-05-15 8:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-15 17:10 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-05-07 7:04 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-07 9:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-07 9:33 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-07 17:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-07 18:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-08 6:07 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-08 5:20 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-08 5:34 ` Dhaval Giani
2008-05-08 6:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-07 17:42 ` Dhaval Giani
2008-05-08 5:21 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-05-08 5:39 ` Dhaval Giani
2008-05-08 6:03 ` Zhang, Yanmin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080512020402.GF15063@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.