From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 8] x86: use PTE_MASK consistently
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 12:11:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080513101125.GA32299@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <patchbomb.1210330958@localhost>
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
> Here's a series to rationalize the use of PTE_MASK and remove some
> amount of ad-hocery.
>
> This gist of the series is:
> 1. Fix the definition of PTE_MASK so that its equally applicable in
> all pagetable modes
> 2. Use it consistently
>
> I haven't tried to address the *_bad() stuff, other than to convert
> pmd_bad_* to use PTE_MASK.
>
> I've compile tested it a bit and run it on 32-bit PAE (native and
> Xen), but I haven't tested it with >4G memory, non-PAE or 64-bit. In
> other words, it needs some time in Ingo's torture machine.
applied, thanks. This patchset has held up fine so far in overnight
testing, nice work.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-13 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-09 11:02 [PATCH 0 of 8] x86: use PTE_MASK consistently Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-09 11:02 ` [PATCH 1 of 8] x86: define PTE_MASK in a universally useful way Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-09 11:02 ` [PATCH 2 of 8] x86: fix warning on 32-bit non-PAE Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-09 11:02 ` [PATCH 3 of 8] x86: rearrange __(VIRTUAL|PHYSICAL)_MASK Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-09 11:02 ` [PATCH 4 of 8] x86: use PTE_MASK in 32-bit PAE Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-09 11:02 ` [PATCH 5 of 8] x86: use PTE_MASK in pgtable_32.h Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-09 15:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-09 18:36 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-09 11:02 ` [PATCH 6 of 8] x86: clarify use of _PAGE_CHG_MASK Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-09 11:02 ` [PATCH 7 of 8] x86: use PTE_MASK rather than ad-hoc mask Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-09 11:02 ` [PATCH 8 of 8] xen: use PTE_MASK in pte_mfn() Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-13 10:11 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-05-20 7:26 [PATCH 0 of 8] x86: use PTE_MASK consistently Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-20 12:57 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-05-20 13:47 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-20 18:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-20 19:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-20 19:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-20 20:02 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080513101125.GA32299@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.