All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk,
	"Alex Villací­s Lasso" <avillaci@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: About p4-clockmod breakage/removal
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 01:56:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080514005636.GA21608@srcf.ucam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200805132048.00653.lenb@kernel.org>

On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 08:48:00PM -0400, Len Brown wrote:

> Assuming this is a laptop with a batter,
> I'd certainly be interested if you could run BLTK
> and measure any benefit to p4-clockmod (I've never
> been able to)

The most plausible benefit to p4-clockmod is its utility in throttling 
the CPU if it would otherwise cause the system to overheat. From that 
point of view, I think it's worth keeping around - especially since not 
all machines expose T states via ACPI.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org

  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-14  0:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-09 15:22 About p4-clockmod breakage/removal Alex Villací­s Lasso
2008-05-14  0:48 ` Len Brown
2008-05-14  0:56   ` Matthew Garrett [this message]
2008-05-14  3:35     ` Len Brown
2008-05-14  9:15       ` Matthew Garrett
2008-05-14 15:18         ` Len Brown
2008-05-14 23:11           ` Matthew Garrett
2008-05-14 11:18     ` Pavel Troller
2008-05-14 17:22       ` Len Brown
2008-05-15  1:55         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-05-15 15:06           ` Alex Villací­s Lasso
2008-05-14 11:36     ` Thomas Renninger
2008-05-14 11:42       ` Matthew Garrett
2008-05-14 12:49         ` Thomas Renninger
2008-05-14 12:56           ` Matthew Garrett
2008-05-14 15:28         ` Len Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080514005636.GA21608@srcf.ucam.org \
    --to=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=avillaci@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec \
    --cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.