From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757996AbYEOKZ5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 May 2008 06:25:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753977AbYEOKZq (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 May 2008 06:25:46 -0400 Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.232]:55075 "EHLO wx-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752144AbYEOKZp (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 May 2008 06:25:45 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=un+y6b4KdqiXeaiv3YINVNDAmdpzbMLC7T/7Xm4QLqy67Gfkzo2VSC0I5UJ63KLRcyb15R15qDmEPPv2ZB9eUKnNyRdbI55NJR3iu3w3myrgnN4RyEUfAZveXNbuA+fORdmw0MrhJVT8ucGUx/D1We1cdp2OyYKrfOqFxMyGfnc= Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 10:29:13 +0000 From: Jarek Poplawski To: Kingsley Foreman Cc: Eric Dumazet , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: NET_SCHED cbq dropping too many packets on a bonding interface Message-ID: <20080515102913.GA6753@ff.dom.local> References: <20080515091216.GA6550@ff.dom.local> <8ECDBB4EB5394859BFFACAAEE3A6EDB0@uglypunk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8ECDBB4EB5394859BFFACAAEE3A6EDB0@uglypunk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 07:36:54PM +0930, Kingsley Foreman wrote: ... > i just rolled back the kernel to 2.6.24 and im seeing the same thing, > > I was using 2.6.22 before and didn't see the problem, txqueuelen on the > bond0 interface is 0 (the default) So, could you try if the size matters here...? Jarek P.