From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olof Johansson Subject: Re: linux-next: i2c build failure Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 14:47:58 -0500 Message-ID: <20080515194758.GA12267@lixom.net> References: <20080515121241.1ede11be.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080515102215.62378c4f@hyperion.delvare> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from lixom.net ([66.141.50.11]:58102 "EHLO mail.lixom.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751300AbYEOTb7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 May 2008 15:31:59 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080515102215.62378c4f@hyperion.delvare> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Jean Delvare Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:22:15AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > Thanks for the notification and sorry for the trouble. I thought that I > knew about all users of struct i2c_board_info and that they were all > converted by now but obviously not. I didn't know that fsl_soc.c had > been partly forked for the pasemi platform. Yeah, I did that because the "real" solution wasn't going to be ready for .25 and I needed my boards to work. I saw no need in abstracting it out and sharing code when it was something so simple that was just going to go away soon anyway... > Olof, please test it if you can. I will push this patch to Linux > quickly. Seems to work ok here. Acked-by: Olof Johansson -Olof