From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.dev.rtsoft.ru (unknown [85.21.88.2]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F13B3DDED7 for ; Fri, 16 May 2008 21:21:41 +1000 (EST) Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 15:21:38 +0400 From: Anton Vorontsov To: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Board-specific PCI fixups [was: Re: [PATCH 2/2] [POWERPC] 86xx: mpc8610_hpcd: add support for ULI RTC] Message-ID: <20080516112138.GA29124@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> References: <20080508142005.GA6749@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> <20080515162048.GA28559@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> <20080516095027.303bb30e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 In-Reply-To: <20080516095027.303bb30e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Reply-To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 09:50:27AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Anton, > > This is not me picking on you, I just want to make a general statement. > > On Thu, 15 May 2008 20:20:48 +0400 Anton Vorontsov wrote: > > > > Could we then apply this to the powerpc-next for proper testing? > > We should not do this. powerpc-next feeds into linux-next which is for > inter subsystem integration testing. Architecture specific testing > should be done before things get to -next. Oh. > I am hoping that Paul will run a separate powerpc tree/branch for powerpc > wide testing and then migrate stuff form there to powerpc-next when he is > happy that things are as good as we can get. This does not mean > "perfect". :-) Yeah, that would be great. Thanks, -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2