From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JxRmJ-0000ec-JD for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 17 May 2008 12:09:12 -0700 Received: from static-71-162-243-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net ([71.162.243.5] helo=grelber.thyrsus.com) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1JxRmI-0003VV-Sd for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 17 May 2008 12:09:11 -0700 From: Rob Landley Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 14:08:51 -0500 References: <200805031518.11029.rob@landley.net> <20080509152217.GF10169@c2.user-mode-linux.org> In-Reply-To: <20080509152217.GF10169@c2.user-mode-linux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200805171408.51880.rob@landley.net> Subject: Re: [uml-devel] =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BPATCH=5D_make_quiet_suppress_parse?= =?iso-8859-1?q?=5Fchan=5Fpair_boot=09messages?= List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Jeff Dike On Friday 09 May 2008 10:22:17 Jeff Dike wrote: > On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 03:18:10PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > > I usually use UML as a better fakeroot, meaning I run it with a command > > line like "rootfstype=hostfs rw quiet > > init=/path/to/some_shell_script.sh". In this context, filling the screen > > with parse_chan_pair error messages which don't actually hurt anything > > defeats the purpose of "quiet". > > > > The patch turns several KERN_ERR into KERN_WARNING. While I was there, I > > merged the redundant printk() statements into a function, and added one > > "else" after a test-for-null that did a printk but didn't do a continue. > > Looks reasonable. Do I have to do anything to follow up, or is it queued to go upstream? (I can redo the printk() with pr_warning(), it's just the original didn't and I didn't change it...) Rob -- "One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code." - Ken Thompson. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel