From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: error while static linking of libxenctrl and libxenguest
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 17:16:06 +0200
Message-ID: <20080519151606.GR5731@implementation>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Hello,

When statically linking the following program:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <xenctrl.h>
#include <xenguest.h>

int main(void) {
	printf("%p\n", xc_domain_resume);
	printf("%p\n", xc_domain_save);
	return 0;
}

gcc -static test.c -o test -lxenguest -lxenctrl -lpthread -lz

we get

/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.2.3/../../../../lib/libxenctrl.a(xc_private.o): In function `lock_pages':
/home/sthibault/xen-unstable-stubdom.hg/tools/libxc/xc_private.c:130: multiple definition of `lock_pages'
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.2.3/../../../../lib/libxenguest.a(xg_private.o):/home/sthibault/xen-unstable-stubdom.hg/tools/libxc/xg_private.c:15: first defined here
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.2.3/../../../../lib/libxenctrl.a(xc_private.o): In function `unlock_pages':
/home/sthibault/xen-unstable-stubdom.hg/tools/libxc/xc_private.c:142: multiple definition of `unlock_pages'
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.2.3/../../../../lib/libxenguest.a(xg_private.o):/home/sthibault/xen-unstable-stubdom.hg/tools/libxc/xg_private.c:24: first defined here

Since libxenguest depends on libxenctrl anyway, shouldn't it use
xc_private's lock/unlock functions?

Samuel