All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, geert@linux-m68k.org,
	linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] provide out-of-line strcat() for m68k
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 12:09:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080521110927.GO28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0805211250180.19545@localhost.localdomain>

On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:53:34PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, 21 May 2008, Al Viro wrote:
> 
> > > It actually was strlen that was generated and not strcat.
> > 
> > Here it replaced strncat() with call of strcat() (gcc 4.0.1, FWIW).
> > And yes, I can show you init/main.s with
> > 	jbsr strcat	|
> > in it generated on kernel in b0rken range...
> 
> Please use a more recent compiler, 4.0 created too many problems on m68k, 
> which we only got under control with 4.1, so at least on m68k 4.0 is not 
> really supported.

Then it's worth mentioning in Documentation/Changes, IMO...  Anyway,
updating m68k toolchain is not a problem; I'll get around to it tonight.
I still think that out-of-line implementation is a good idea, if nothing
else it would prevent future crap of the same kind if some later version
decides that strlen(a) + strlen(b) can be proven to be less than size
argument of strncat(), etc.

Technically we _are_ in nasal daemon country with redefining str*, unless
we pass -ffreestanding; m68k doesn't, so we can't guarantee that new stuff
of that kind won't crop up.  IOW, it might be a good policy to have fallback
implementations of potentially affected primitives...

  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-21 11:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-21  1:12 [PATCH] provide out-of-line strcat() for m68k Al Viro
2008-05-21  3:34 ` Roman Zippel
2008-05-21  5:30   ` Al Viro
2008-05-21 10:53     ` Roman Zippel
2008-05-21 11:09       ` Al Viro [this message]
2008-05-21  7:52 ` -ffreestanding or not -ffreestanding Adrian Bunk
2008-05-21 11:44   ` Roman Zippel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080521110927.GO28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.