From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH] Make acpi-cpufreq more robust against BIOS freq changes behind our back Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 08:00:41 -0700 Message-ID: <20080521150041.GA15975@kroah.com> References: <482DCF52.6030307@awtrey.com> <20080519000810.GA11313@codemonkey.org.uk> <1211279939.21269.403.camel@queen.suse.de> <48341AB8.3090401@awtrey.com> <1211375286.29901.7.camel@queen.suse.de> <1211375701.29901.11.camel@queen.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1211375701.29901.11.camel@queen.suse.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk To: Thomas Renninger Cc: Dave Jones , Greg KH , Stable , cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 03:15:01PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote: > On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 15:08 +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Please consider this one for stable integration. > ... > > If this one patches for you for 2.6.24.4 also, maybe it even gets in > > there. > Hmm, I added this to OpenSUSE 10.3, means 2.6.22. > I only had to adjust the arch/i386 vs arch/x86 patch. > If this gets into the stable kernel, I wonder how far back this makes > sense. Shall I send a 2.6.22 based version? The stable team is only tracking 2.6.25 kernels right now, anything older than that is not something we currently care about. thanks, greg k-h