From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1762616AbYEUXgv@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1762616AbYEUXgv (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 21 May 2008 19:36:51 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759739AbYEUXgk
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 21 May 2008 19:36:40 -0400
Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:52675 "EHLO
	ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1756420AbYEUXgj (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 21 May 2008 19:36:39 -0400
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 00:35:39 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
       Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>, tytso@mit.edu, hch@infradead.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: CFD: linux-wanking@vger.kernel.org (was [PATCH] Standard
	indentation of arguments)
Message-ID: <20080521233539.GR28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
References: <12113495282137-git-send-email-kongjianjun@gmail.com> <20080521083413.GM28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20080521015037.add0b78e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080521103206.GA24545@infradead.org> <20080521120939.GF8581@mit.edu> <20080521104644.5b6f4e63.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080521185725.GD6932@cvg> <20080521123127.3b3b66af.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080521230155.GC16376@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080521230155.GC16376@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 02:01:55AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:

> There are many other open source projects where it might be easier to 
> get started and that are really looking for people wanting to get 
> involved.

*blink*

OK, I give up; how was it supposed to be parsed?  I can't come up with any
way of reading that sentence that would not be an obvious glaring idiocy
and I don't see any obvious typos or word omissions that could have created
that.

Surely you are not saying that we are not really looking for more people
doing useful work?  And doing that without "getting involved"... could
any resident Zen master enlighten me?  I seem to be unable to figure out
how the hell one could pull off such a feat...