From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Cameron Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 00:00:17 +0000 Subject: Re: Re: about pppd termination? Message-Id: <20080522000017.GE6559@hp.com> List-Id: References: <200805211447103125311@foxmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200805211447103125311@foxmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 07:14:13PM -0400, James Carlson wrote: > I'm not familiar with that GUI. Good, I'm trying to let it die. It is written in PHP-GTK. > Is this a "nodetach" case? No, updetach is used. > An alternative might be to avoid sending signals to the process group > if pppd is not actually the group leader. This would have the side effect of not terminating the processes that pppd started. Wouldn't it be better if pppd made itself the group leader? -- James Cameron http://quozl.netrek.org/ HP Open Source, Volunteer http://opensource.hp.com/ PPTP Client Project, Release Engineer http://pptpclient.sourceforge.net/