Re: Re: about pppd termination?

[James Cameron <james.cameron@hp.com>]

On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 08:38:22PM -0400, James Carlson wrote:
> Is it possible that the signal was sent before the setsid() was done
> (i.e., before IPCP went Opened)?  If so, then we might need to tweak
> how the process group is managed in the special case of (at least)
> updetach.

Yes, that's the situation.  I remember now.  Until we added the handler
for SIGINT in the GUI, what would happen is that the GUI would die with
a SIGINT as a result of the user hitting the "Cancel" button before the
tunnel was established.  That button sent a SIGINT to the pppd which had
not yet detached.

-- 
James Cameron                         http://quozl.netrek.org/
HP Open Source, Volunteer             http://opensource.hp.com/
PPTP Client Project, Release Engineer http://pptpclient.sourceforge.net/