Re: Re: issue about PIDs ?

["cyx_mail" <cyx_mail@foxmail.com>]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1254", Size: 1516 bytes --]

 
> Workaround is to define a handler or ignore the SIGTERM signal in your pppoe-server code.

you mean define a handler in pppd code? what function should call in the handler to bring the pppd down gracefully?

2008-05-22 

·¢¼þÈË£º James Cameron 
·¢ËÍʱ¼ä£º 2008-05-22  07:11:51 
ÊÕ¼þÈË£º cyx_mail 
³­ËÍ£º linux-ppp 
Ö÷Ì⣺ Re: issue about PIDs ? 
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 09:31:20PM +0800, cyx_mail wrote:
> I modified the pppoe-server code ,and let pppoe-server spawn a pppd.
> then let the server send SIGTEM to pppd(using kill(pppd 2's pid ,
> SIGTEM)) not using the normal way(such as stopsession as the code
> written). the pppoe-server and pppd die both, why?
I guess you mean SIGTERM.  This matches my observation with pptpconfig.
Workaround is to define a handler or ignore the SIGTERM signal in your
pppoe-server code.
NetworkManager-pptp also specifically handles SIGTERM and SIGINT,
presumably for the same reason.
-- 
James Cameron                         http://quozl.netrek.org/
HP Open Source, Volunteer             http://opensource.hp.com/
PPTP Client Project, Release Engineer http://pptpclient.sourceforge.net/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
__________ NOD32 3090 (20080509) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.nod32cn.com
ÿôèº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰­†+%ŠËÿ±éݶ\x17¥Šwÿº{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±þšiþ)í…æèw*\x1fjg¬±¨\x1e¶‰šŽŠÝ¢jÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸\f¢·¦j:+v‰¨ŠwèjØm¶Ÿÿþø\x1e¯ù\x1e®w¥þŠàþf£¢·hšâúÿ†Ù¥