From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: kvm-lite, lguest64: status?
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 11:09:00 +1000
Message-ID: <200805261109.01065.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
References: <4836C2C7.4010903@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <4836C2C7.4010903@redhat.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization>,
	<mailto:virtualization-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/virtualization>
List-Post: <mailto:virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:virtualization-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization>,
	<mailto:virtualization-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org
Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org
To: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org

On Friday 23 May 2008 23:12:39 Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>   Hi,
>
> Just a quick question:  What is the status of the two projects in
> $subject?  Havn't heared anything for a while for both ...

Hi Gerd,

    lguest64 I'll punt to Glauber.  For kvm-lite, frankly there wasn't enough 
interest, and I wasn't going to continue it by myself: IBM certainly (and 
correctly) sees virtio as more important.

Cheers,
Rusty.