From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755554AbYEZMzg (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 May 2008 08:55:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754146AbYEZMz1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 May 2008 08:55:27 -0400 Received: from vs166246.vserver.de ([62.75.166.246]:54648 "EHLO vs166246.vserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752027AbYEZMz0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 May 2008 08:55:26 -0400 From: Michael Buesch To: Alexandre Oliva Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] firmware: Add CONFIG_BUILTIN_FIRMWARE option Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 14:53:01 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) Cc: Marcel Holtmann , Johannes Berg , David Woodhouse , Sam Ravnborg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Abhay Salunke , kay.sievers@vrfy.org, Takashi Iwai References: <1211550282.28967.8.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <200805252049.39731.mb@bu3sch.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200805261453.01658.mb@bu3sch.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 26 May 2008 05:13:18 Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On May 25, 2008, Michael Buesch wrote: > > > One additional thing is to make sure the usability of the whole stuff > > is not reduded. > > Removing support for slashes wouldn't reduce usability. It would be > no more than silly policy (and ego?) enforcement. I the other mail you say that the string is _not_ a filename. So why do we want to remove the slash from the allowed charset, if the string is not a filename? This doesn't make any sense. Either it is a filename/pathname, or it is not. -- Greetings Michael.