From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751868AbYE1Qky (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2008 12:40:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751985AbYE1Qke (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2008 12:40:34 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:42233 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751785AbYE1Qkd (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2008 12:40:33 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 09:49:39 -0400 From: Dave Jones To: Steven Whitehouse Cc: Linux Kernel Subject: Re: 2.6.26rc4 GFS2 oops. Message-ID: <20080528134939.GB29374@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Steven Whitehouse , Linux Kernel References: <20080527194420.GB14577@redhat.com> <1211974564.3635.585.camel@quoit> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1211974564.3635.585.camel@quoit> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 12:36:04PM +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 15:44 -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > Single node GFS2 filesystem. Run fsx. Boom. > > > I've tried it on -nmw and it seems to run ok, and I'm currently running > it on the current upstream kernel and its done 1/2 hour so far with no > sign of a problem. > > Can you give a few more details, such as the block size of the fs whatever the defaults that mkfs used. (unless anaconda did something funky, which is unlikely). [the box is switched off right now, and I'm not near it so I can't check it easily]. > , the > exact command line for fsx (I was just running with defaults) same. just "./fsx foo" > and > perhaps check all the info into a Red Hat bugzilla? I know this is > upstream, but I tend to use "Fedora/rawhide" to keep tabs on such things > just so as all the bugs are in the same place, no problem. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk