From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758828AbYE2Vjd (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 17:39:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754296AbYE2Vj0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 17:39:26 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:59112 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752511AbYE2VjZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 17:39:25 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 14:39:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20080529.143921.34376298.davem@davemloft.net> To: tytso@mit.edu Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, ksummit-2008-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2008-discuss] Fixing the Kernel Janitors project From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20080529211404.GH8065@mit.edu> References: <20080529124548.GC8065@mit.edu> <20080529.135431.235149338.davem@davemloft.net> <20080529211404.GH8065@mit.edu> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Theodore Tso Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 17:14:04 -0400 > On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 01:54:31PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > > Yes, process is important, but I'd say it deserved 1/3 of the summit > > time, but not one minute more. > > We were about 50-50 last time, roughly. So let's see if there is > consensus to dial it back this year, based on topics that people > suggest. Today at LinuxTAG, Thomas Gleixner and I tossed around the idea that (assuming a 3 day event) we do tech stuff on day 1, process stuff on day 2, and back to tech stuff on day 3. The idea is that you hash out the initial impressions of your ideas on day 1, your mind works on the problem in the background on day 2, and they everyone has the answers on day 3 :-) Another idea we discussed briefly was some kind of organized run over the bugzilla entries. And just to make it interesting we could award some silly prize to whoever fixed the most interesting or amusing bug during the bug-run, as voted by the attendees.