From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: "Alexander van Heukelum" <heukelum@fastmail.fm>
Cc: "Dave Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"kernel list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel" <dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: in-kernel DRM tree move around....
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 11:34:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080529113406.5d8f75c4@core> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1212051908.8215.1255644495@webmail.messagingengine.com>
On Thu, 29 May 2008 11:05:08 +0200
"Alexander van Heukelum" <heukelum@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 May 2008 10:46:22 +1000, "Dave Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>
> said:
> > Hi,
> >
> > So I've been growing more annoyed with the current layout of the drm
> > tree in the kernel,
> >
> > a) it lives under char.
> > b) everything in one directory.
> > c) header files in one directory.
> > d) no header files exposed to userspace.
> >
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/airlied/drm-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=7df9a948d0f849466e3de259cccb49bc54cbad68
> >
> > is a proposal to create drivers/gpu/drm, (I may move AGP in there as
> > well later). It also creates per-driver subdirs.
>
> Looks like a lot more suitable place! I just wonder if drivers/video/drm
> would be even more logical?
I think gpu is better - we are seeing various GPU as CPU accelerator
toolkits appearing and assuming the AMD one ends up open source we will
end up with gpu/something that isn't video.
Remember GPU = Grahi^WGeneric Processing Unit ;)
Alan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-29 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-29 0:46 in-kernel DRM tree move around Dave Airlie
2008-05-29 4:23 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-29 5:23 ` Dave Airlie
2008-05-29 7:33 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-29 8:20 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-05-29 9:05 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-05-29 10:34 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2008-05-29 11:02 ` David Woodhouse
2008-05-30 6:26 ` Dave Airlie
2008-05-30 16:58 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-05-29 19:41 ` Eric Anholt
2008-06-01 14:57 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080529113406.5d8f75c4@core \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=heukelum@fastmail.fm \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.