From: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: LinuxPPS low-level IRQs timestamps & ldisc
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 19:22:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080602172203.GI26854@enneenne.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080602164840.0dc9cb96@core>
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 04:48:40PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > I prefere avoid the if clause for getnstimeofday() since each
> > instruction delay may decrease time precision, so:
>
> Why should everyone else pay the cost of the getnstimeofday they don't
> need ?
>
> The single conditional check at the start won't make the slightest
> material difference to your accuracy.
In the past we noticed that just moving up the getnstimeofday() of
only one instruction, from:
port->icount.dcd++;
getnstimeofday(&ts);
to:
getnstimeofday(&ts);
port->icount.dcd++;
the time precision improved from 5ms to 2ms...
However, if you prefere that I add the if clause, I'll do it.
Thanks,
Rodolfo
--
GNU/Linux Solutions e-mail: giometti@enneenne.com
Linux Device Driver giometti@linux.it
Embedded Systems phone: +39 349 2432127
UNIX programming skype: rodolfo.giometti
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-02 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-01 16:15 LinuxPPS low-level IRQs timestamps & ldisc Rodolfo Giometti
2008-06-01 19:26 ` Lennart Sorensen
2008-06-02 6:51 ` Alan Cox
2008-06-02 9:25 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2008-06-02 14:02 ` Alan Cox
2008-06-02 14:56 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2008-06-02 15:48 ` Alan Cox
2008-06-02 17:22 ` Rodolfo Giometti [this message]
2008-06-02 19:35 ` Alan Cox
2008-06-02 20:21 ` Matti Aarnio
2008-06-03 13:40 ` Alan Cox
2008-06-02 17:09 ` Lennart Sorensen
2008-06-02 16:59 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080602172203.GI26854@enneenne.com \
--to=giometti@enneenne.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.