From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760150AbYFDK1d (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2008 06:27:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760058AbYFDK1T (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2008 06:27:19 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:51784 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760052AbYFDK1S (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2008 06:27:18 -0400 Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 12:27:03 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: 32 bit use e820_register_active_regions Message-ID: <20080604102703.GE22971@elte.hu> References: <200806031025.55026.yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> <200806031934.01198.yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> <200806031935.05202.yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200806031935.05202.yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.1 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.1 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_05 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.1 BAYES_05 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 1 to 5% [score: 0.0272] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Yinghai Lu wrote: > so 32bit is more like 64bit, and more smart with combining e820 and numa. > > Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu applied, thanks. Ingo