From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1K412w-0004KC-IJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2008 18:01:30 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1K412v-0004K0-7l
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2008 18:01:30 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37448 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K412v-0004Jx-2S
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2008 18:01:29 -0400
Received: from relay01.mx.bawue.net ([193.7.176.67]:56860)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <ths@networkno.de>) id 1K412u-000784-Kb
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2008 18:01:28 -0400
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 23:01:24 +0100
From: Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] Introduce foreach_cpu shorthand
Message-ID: <20080604220124.GA15504@networkno.de>
References: <4845A1D6.5050005@web.de> <48468CED.9000706@bellard.org>
	<4846DD33.2070206@web.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4846DD33.2070206@web.de>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Fabrice Bellard wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I tend to dislike such macros...
> 
> Why?

IHMO it isn't a useful abstraction (and therefore code obfuscation).


Thiemo