From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] i2c: Use i2c_listener in driver f75375s Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 11:06:59 +0200 Message-ID: <20080605110659.3456fbe4@hyperion.delvare> References: <20080604201334.19636f30@hyperion.delvare> <20080604203322.472f8653@hyperion.delvare> <4847A4E2.9040406@movial.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4847A4E2.9040406-WgUW+8SLYMv1KXRcyAk9cg@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: i2c-bounces-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: i2c-bounces-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org To: Riku Voipio Cc: David Brownell , Linux I2C List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 05 Jun 2008 11:33:38 +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > Jean Delvare wrote: > > Replace the legacy f75375s i2c_driver by an i2c_listener. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare > > --- > > Riku, any chance you could test this one? Thanks. > > > I can test that the new style driver still works after these tests, > but I don't have testing if the driver still works in > cases were f75375_legacy driver used to work (which I guess is what > you are interested in) is tricker. I do however like the concept. I have already tested the latter, using i2c-stub + a dump of a F75375S chip. So if you can test the former (new-style) we cover the whole set of possibilities and that's alright :) Thanks, -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ i2c mailing list i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c