From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] x86: I/O APIC: Timer through 8259A second-chance
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 23:00:45 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080605190045.GD7030@cvg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0806051911500.2875@cliff.in.clinika.pl>
[Maciej W. Rozycki - Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 07:33:04PM +0100]
| On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
|
| > NOTE: you need to copy out and use the boot parameters from the boot
| > log:
| >
| > [ 0.000000] Command line: root=/dev/sda6 console=ttyS0,115200
| > earlyprintk=se rial,ttyS0,115200 debug initcall_debug apic=verbose
| > sysrq_always_enabled ignore _loglevel selinux=0 nmi_watchdog=1
| > profile=0 maxcpus=1 nosmp no_hz=off highres =0 noapic nolapic_timer
| > hpet=disable idle=mwait
| >
| > as -tip testing occasionally randomizes boot parameters too. (to find
| > regressions like this) Let me know if you cannot reproduce this.
|
| Thanks. I figured out I cannot build an x86-64 kernel, because my i386
| compiler does not support the target. Probably because of target library
| dependencies at the time I built my compiler. I would have to build a
| bare-iron cross-compiler for the x86-64 which I'd rather not to just to
| fix this small problem -- it usually takes a few days to sort out all the
| pesky details when doing such a build from scratch, so it better be well
| justified.
|
| However, the reason is quite clear to me -- the command line specifies
| "noapic" among others (there is also "nosmp", but probably overridden by
| "maxcpus=1" -- I am afraid there is no clear precedence among these
| options), so the bug is the I/O APIC NMI watchdog is tried at all. This
| is also clearly seen from the log where the I/O APIC is not set up at all.
|
| A fix along the lines of what I implemented for "nosmp" in the
| "nosmp-watchdog" patch is needed which I will post shortly. It's needed
| both for the i386 and the x86-64 target; hopefully the latter does not
| differ too much from the former.
|
| Maciej
|
Btw, just for the record: my hang was exactly on same line as Ingo reported:
static int __init pci_acpi_init(void) {
...
printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: Using ACPI for IRQ routing\n");
...
}
well, Ingo had a few additional messages caused by debug_initcall,
but I guess there was a real hang. I mean acpi_irq_penalty_init()
is never reached (I've added a few printk there to be sure).
- Cyrill -
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-05 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-27 20:19 [PATCH 8/8] x86: I/O APIC: Timer through 8259A second-chance Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-05-31 10:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-05 9:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-05 14:55 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-06-05 15:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-05 18:33 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-06-05 18:52 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-06-05 19:47 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-06-05 19:00 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-05-21 21:10 Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-05-27 20:18 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080605190045.GD7030@cvg \
--to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.